Clampdown on ‘cosmetic cowboys’
 

Dental News
Article detail

See the following article detail about

Clampdown on ‘cosmetic cowboys’

0845 527 9810

Article details for

Clampdown on ‘cosmetic cowboys’

 

Clampdown on ‘cosmetic cowboys’

The Conservatives have demanded a clampdown on ‘cosmetic cowboys' who carry out potentially harmful tooth-whitening procedures in the high street.

Mike Penning, the Tory spokesman on dentistry, accused the government of shying away from action necessary to stop unqualified, ‘rogue beauticians' from using chemicals to for bleaching.

Mr Penning, who has already called for new legislation to regulate high street Botox operations, said such a law could be extended to cover ‘highly dangerous' whitening procedures. Such procedures, increasingly carried out by unqualified therapists who charge significantly less than professional dentists, have in some cases been blamed for permanently damaging patients' teeth.

In February, Dentistry.co.uk reported on the case of a 23-year-old woman who was forced to see a dentist for restoration work after she paid £200 to have her teeth treated with chlorine dioxide, an industrial bleaching agent, and two days later found they were browner than before.

The law states that it is a criminal offence for anyone other than a registered dentist or dental care professional to practise dentistry. Both the Department of Health and the General Dental Council (GDC) say this includes tooth whitening.

A DoH spokeswoman said: ‘Anyone who applies a tooth whitening product to another person is undertaking the practice of dentistry. Under the Dentists Act 1984, only dentists and in any certain circumstances, dental care professionals like dental hygienists can undertake the practice of dentistry. Beauticians and hairdressers who apply the products are breaking the law and are regularly prosecuted through actions initiated by trading standards officers.'

The GDC, which regulates the profession, agreed that unqualified high-street beauticians who carried out tooth-whitening procedures were breaking the law. It said the Council investigated reports of such practices and took ‘appropriate action' when required, up to and including legal action.

In October 2006 the GDC successfully prosecuted an individual, who was not GDC-registered, for the illegal practice of dentistry for carrying out a tooth-whitening procedure. A GDC spokeswoman said: ‘We are committed to protecting the public by prosecuting people who are not registered with the GDC and who perform – or provide clinical advice about – tooth whitening because we believe this is illegal practice.'

But Mr Penning said such prosecutions, for a practice that was so widespread, were few and far between. Although it was ‘technically' illegal, in practice the law was ‘not being enforced'.

He told Dentistry he had passed a high street beauty salon in Essex a few weeks ago openly offering tooth-whitening procedures for £150. He claimed that in some instances unqualified providers who were forced to halt their illegal procedures started up again soon after the authorities moved on.

He said: ‘It's the government's job to enforce that and take action against cosmetic cowboys. If there is legislation it's not working and not providing the protection people need.'

Mr Penning said a new law should be introduced to make it easier to enforce professional standards on a range of cosmetic procedures, including the injection of Botox as well as tooth whitening. The law would explicitly ‘ban tooth lightening with peroxide outright – unless done by a fully qualified dentist'. He added: ‘I will be pushing the government to find out why they are not willing to legislate to protect the public.'

In September, consumer group ‘Which?' said it had discovered beauty salons allowing unqualified staff to carry out tooth-whitening treatments that could inflict permanent damage.

It said that while most treatments used hydrogen peroxide or carbamide peroxide, both proven to bleach teeth, others offered a chlorine dioxide treatment, a bleaching agent which could wreck tooth enamel.

Other clinics were using hydrogen peroxide in strengths from 0.6% to 10%, above the legal limit of 0.1%, it claimed. The GDC said it had launched investigations into several of the clinics.
By Andy Tate, parliamentary correspondent

 Posted on : Mon 12th - Nov - 2007

 

Call Dental Support UK

Premium IT Support

  • All Servers & workstations covered..
  • Saturday Cover INCLUDED.
  • Telephone support.
  • Remote support.
  • 4 hour on-site Server response.
  • System monitoring.
  • Network monitoring and security.
  • Anti-Virus & Application updates.
  • Unlimited Remote Server Data backup.
  • Loan equipment on hardware failure.
  • Reduced rates for PC parts supply & installations.

No matter how big
your practice you
pay the same
price!!


ONLY

Click here for more info
Dental News Archives 2018

August - 2018
July - 2018
June - 2018
May - 2018
April - 2018
March - 2018
February - 2018
January - 2018

Dental News Archives 2017

December - 2017
November - 2017
October - 2017
September - 2017
August - 2017
July - 2017
June - 2017
May - 2017
April - 2017
March - 2017
February - 2017
January - 2017

Dental News Archives 2016

December - 2016
November - 2016
October - 2016
September - 2016
August - 2016
July - 2016
June - 2016
May - 2016
April - 2016
March - 2016
February - 2016
January - 2016

Dental News Archives 2015

December - 2015
November - 2015
October - 2015
September - 2015
August - 2015
July - 2015
June - 2015
May - 2015
April - 2015
March - 2015
February - 2015
January - 2015

Dental News Archives 2014

December - 2014
November - 2014
October - 2014
September - 2014
August - 2014
July - 2014
June - 2014
May - 2014
April - 2014
March - 2014
February - 2014
January - 2014

Dental News Archives 2013

December - 2013
November - 2013
October - 2013
September - 2013
August - 2013
July - 2013
June - 2013
May - 2013
April - 2013
March - 2013
February - 2013
January - 2013

Dental News Archives 2012

December - 2012
November - 2012
October - 2012
September - 2012
August - 2012
July - 2012
June - 2012
May - 2012
April - 2012
March - 2012
February - 2012
January - 2012

Dental News Archives 2011

January - 2011
February - 2011
March - 2011
April - 2011
May - 2011
June - 2011
July - 2011
August - 2011
September - 2011
October - 2011
November - 2011
December - 2011

Dental News Archives 2010

December - 2010
November - 2010
October - 2010
September - 2010
August - 2010
July - 2010
June - 2010
May - 2010
April - 2010
March - 2010
February - 2010
January - 2010

Dental News Archives 2009

December - 2009
November - 2009
October - 2009
September - 2009
August - 2009
July - 2009
June - 2009
May - 2009
April - 2009
March - 2009
February - 2009
January - 2009

Dental News Archives 2008

December - 2008
November - 2008
October - 2008
September - 2008
August - 2008
July - 2008
June - 2008
May - 2008
April - 2008
March - 2008
February - 2008
January - 2008

Dental News Archives 2007

December - 2007
November - 2007
October - 2007
September - 2007
August - 2007
July - 2007
June - 2007
May - 2007
April - 2007
March - 2007
February - 2007
January - 2007

Dental News Archives 2006

December - 2006
November - 2006
October - 2006
September - 2006
August - 2006
July - 2006
June - 2006
May - 2006
April - 2006
March - 2006
February - 2006
January - 2006

Dental News Archives 2005

December - 2005
November - 2005
October - 2005
September - 2005
August - 2005
July - 2005
June - 2005
May - 2005

hide toolbar
Would you like weekly updates on our latest offers? If so enter your email :
Quick Remote Dental Support