The topic on dentist's lips...

Dental News
Article detail

See the following article detail about

The topic on dentist's lips...

0845 527 9810

Article details for

The topic on dentist's lips...


The topic on dentist's lips...

There is no doubting the hottest topic of conversation in English dental corridors right now – this month marks the beginning of the registration process with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) for primary care dental services, and also the promised consultation on the proposed charging structure, which is controversial to say the least. At this stage there is no cost attached to registration – that part of the pain only starts next April.

Put simply, every dental practice in England that wishes to provide dental services on or after 1 April 2011 (about 150 days from now) will need to have registered with CQC by then. The crucial point to note is that this applies to private practices just as much as to NHS and mixed practices, to big practices and massive corporate chains as well as the small, single-handed operation located above the fish and chip shop, and to orthodontic practices, denture-only practices and emergency-only practices alike, although there are slightly different considerations according to the basis and extent of the registration (i.e. whether as one or more individuals or as an organisation, whether the regulated services will all be provided from a single location or multiple locations…).

Once registered, each provider of regulated services must, at each location, comply with a series of defined ‘outcome' measures and be able to demonstrate that one is doing so. All the details are widely available from a variety of sources, and plenty of guidance and hand-holding is also available to help struggling practices through the process (and not least, the jargon). Before the doors to registration were even ajar, I had counted no less than 25 organisations that were offering various packages of information and practical assistance – and at various prices, of course.

There is a widespread view that this additional layer of oversight is an unnecessary and unwelcome duplication of existing regulation and governance – whether by PCTs, the GDC or others. There is also widespread irritation at the fact that primary care medical practices working exclusively in the NHS – who did rather well out of their own ‘new contract' negotiations before we ended up with the shambolic UDA system that followed – will mostly continue to enjoy an exemption from CQC registration for the time being, although a number of specific ‘higher risk' procedures have been identified as regulated activities requiring CQC registration even if undertaken wholly within the NHS. Meanwhile, struggling small dental practices will be held firmly under water until the last bubbles are seen to have dispersed.  Don't expect to see any tears of anguish from the Department of Health if and when many of the smallest dental practices fall by the wayside or elect to close their doors. I have observed previously that the controls are out of control – and so they are – but that is too easy, and only part of the story.

A lot of ill-informed nonsense continues to be written about the CQC, perhaps in an attempt to match the ill-informed nonsense that was written to justify what the benefits of the CQC oversight would be.  It is plainly ridiculous, for example, to say that CQC registration and regulation directly duplicates GDC registration and regulation – the former is concerned with the healthcare facilities, systems and processes while the latter is concerned with the individuals working within them. There are inevitable areas of overlap because GDC-registered people are operating the systems and processes that CQC will monitor. But the stated aim is to minimise duplication while also ensuring that no gaps are left, through which patient safety and standards of care could slip. Another minor detail is that while associates, assistants, and DCPs are personally registered with and accountable to the GDC in their own right, they are neither registered with, nor accountable to, the CQC. That joy is reserved for those who own and operate the practices, and it is these people who feel overburdened with regulation.

Warm clothing
It was equally ridiculous for the government to have assumed huge financial savings and the freeing-up of precious NHS resources on the basis that CQC registration and oversight would somehow prevent large numbers of vCJD transmissions. What transmissions exactly? The profession is still waiting for much of the evidence to support the requirements of HTM 01-05 and if you plan to wait for the evidence showing the dramatic reduction in dental vCJD transmissions resulting from CQC's impact upon dentistry, may I suggest that you arm yourself with a blanket, some emergency food rations and a thermos flask – because you could be waiting a very long time.

On the other hand, is it really so unreasonable that the public should be able to expect certain minimum standards whenever they receive dental care and treatment, irrespective of whether it is being provided privately or within the NHS? Of course it isn't – surely we can agree that it is perverse that a small NHS, vocational training practice gets inspected regularly but a large private practice may never have been inspected at all, by anybody, at any time in its history. Up to now, GDC oversight has been mostly reactive – responding to and acting upon complaints and information after problems have arisen. CQC is designed to be much more proactive – just as the GDC aims to be itself, once its revalidation procedures swing into action in about four years.
Some would say that if patients have been happy to attend and pay  dentists in private practice, and no complaints have been received, then nothing much will be gained by introducing a heavy layer of governance to demonstrate that all is well.

Quality assurance is about creating environments in which good things are more likely to happen, more often, and where bad things are less likely to happen. There is a fair bit of evidence, though, that quality improvement initiatives work better when those whose activities are the intended subject of the improvement, are involved and actively engaging with the process rather than feeling themselves being dragged into it or having it imposed upon them – and they work best of all when hearts and minds are first won over by persuading them why the new and additional processes are necessary.

Instead, the picture is depressingly familiar, with the decision being made first, and only then the search for some ‘virtual' evidence to support it, in order to remedy a ‘virtual' problem, or one that has been extrapolated from medical and/or hospital experience. In many cases the shape of the CQC requirements and standards are based upon speculation and assumptions, even if they do make sense in abstract terms. Ironically, one of the recurring CQC expectations is that of compliance with the evidence base and published guidance. The result is that instead of bringing the body of the profession along with the change, the chorus is one of opposition and resentment – and all the positive aspects of CQC (and there are many) get lost in the growing resistance movement. It is also true that very many practices are doing most of what is required already. Their journey will therefore be short (although not without cost) while those who start furthest from the intended standard face the hardest journey and the greatest cost as the quest for the proverbial ‘level playing field' leaves base camp.

One of the less obvious, but very clever sub-plots in all of this is the continuing erosion of self-regulation and progressive disempowerment of dentists.  While still technically independent contractors, it doesn't feel much like independence anymore. It feels increasingly like employment without any of the fringe benefits. CQC has also made clear its intention to use non-dentists to sift through the ‘evidence', visit practices and check compliance. With the proposed demise of the PCTs, their dental advisers will also disappear.

The colleague-to-colleague oversight of the Dental Reference Service in England and Wales has been progressively dismantled over several years, and over 30 of them were shown the way to the departure lounge only last month – their services no longer being required. We have already lost the last vestige of self-regulation at the GDC, and through the most elegant sleight of hand, the dental profession will soon be left meeting the entire cost of its own regulation both by the GDC and by CQC. In the old days, the State was paying for the whole DPB empire (and it even employed the dental officers directly until the late 1980s), the PCT commissioning industry, and shedloads of other ‘arms length bodies'.

I think we are gradually getting the message. Or if not, we should be.

Kevin Lewis is renowned for his vibrant and influential writing, where he imparts his unique insight into UK dentistry. In his 20 years in full-time general practice, Kevin developed special interests in preventive dentistry and practice management. He has been involved with Dental Protection since 1989, initially on the board of directors, then as dento-legal advisor, before being appointed dental director in 1998. Kevin isalso a popular speaker, lecturing on a variety of issues at many different events worldwide.He has contributed to two CD training programmes on infection control, and a BDA A12 Advice Sheet. In 2003, he became a member of the Council of the Medical Protection Society.

 Posted on : Thu 4th - Nov - 2010


Call Dental Support UK

Premium IT Support

  • All Servers & workstations covered..
  • Saturday Cover INCLUDED.
  • Telephone support.
  • Remote support.
  • 4 hour on-site Server response.
  • System monitoring.
  • Network monitoring and security.
  • Anti-Virus & Application updates.
  • Unlimited Remote Server Data backup.
  • Loan equipment on hardware failure.
  • Reduced rates for PC parts supply & installations.

No matter how big
your practice you
pay the same


Click here for more info
Dental News Archives 2018

November - 2018
October - 2018
September - 2018
August - 2018
July - 2018
June - 2018
May - 2018
April - 2018
March - 2018
February - 2018
January - 2018

Dental News Archives 2017

December - 2017
November - 2017
October - 2017
September - 2017
August - 2017
July - 2017
June - 2017
May - 2017
April - 2017
March - 2017
February - 2017
January - 2017

Dental News Archives 2016

December - 2016
November - 2016
October - 2016
September - 2016
August - 2016
July - 2016
June - 2016
May - 2016
April - 2016
March - 2016
February - 2016
January - 2016

Dental News Archives 2015

December - 2015
November - 2015
October - 2015
September - 2015
August - 2015
July - 2015
June - 2015
May - 2015
April - 2015
March - 2015
February - 2015
January - 2015

Dental News Archives 2014

December - 2014
November - 2014
October - 2014
September - 2014
August - 2014
July - 2014
June - 2014
May - 2014
April - 2014
March - 2014
February - 2014
January - 2014

Dental News Archives 2013

December - 2013
November - 2013
October - 2013
September - 2013
August - 2013
July - 2013
June - 2013
May - 2013
April - 2013
March - 2013
February - 2013
January - 2013

Dental News Archives 2012

December - 2012
November - 2012
October - 2012
September - 2012
August - 2012
July - 2012
June - 2012
May - 2012
April - 2012
March - 2012
February - 2012
January - 2012

Dental News Archives 2011

January - 2011
February - 2011
March - 2011
April - 2011
May - 2011
June - 2011
July - 2011
August - 2011
September - 2011
October - 2011
November - 2011
December - 2011

Dental News Archives 2010

December - 2010
November - 2010
October - 2010
September - 2010
August - 2010
July - 2010
June - 2010
May - 2010
April - 2010
March - 2010
February - 2010
January - 2010

Dental News Archives 2009

December - 2009
November - 2009
October - 2009
September - 2009
August - 2009
July - 2009
June - 2009
May - 2009
April - 2009
March - 2009
February - 2009
January - 2009

Dental News Archives 2008

December - 2008
November - 2008
October - 2008
September - 2008
August - 2008
July - 2008
June - 2008
May - 2008
April - 2008
March - 2008
February - 2008
January - 2008

Dental News Archives 2007

December - 2007
November - 2007
October - 2007
September - 2007
August - 2007
July - 2007
June - 2007
May - 2007
April - 2007
March - 2007
February - 2007
January - 2007

Dental News Archives 2006

December - 2006
November - 2006
October - 2006
September - 2006
August - 2006
July - 2006
June - 2006
May - 2006
April - 2006
March - 2006
February - 2006
January - 2006

Dental News Archives 2005

December - 2005
November - 2005
October - 2005
September - 2005
August - 2005
July - 2005
June - 2005
May - 2005

hide toolbar
Would you like weekly updates on our latest offers? If so enter your email :
Quick Remote Dental Support